Hybels v Driscoll
I was shocked to load up Technorati today and see Mark Driscoll at position six for top searches. My initial thoughts were, “what are all the freaks writing about him now.” Driscoll, being human, is not perfect and is subject to error - but has apologised many times when proven wrong. More than often though, it’s those that don’t know him that make the most outlandish rants about him. So it always pays to look things up and these are the events leading to this popular uprising.
According to Driscoll’s website, he was asked to make an 8 minute video for a church planting conference. Last year he attended the conference but chose not to this year due to the logistics involved. So he and his team made the following clip..
Once it aired, Bill Hybels was introduced and the words out of his mouth were along the lines of, “After that video I would like to acknowledge that there are women in this room and they have spiritual gifts.” Apparently a whole bunch of applause and yelling followed. Anyway, the conference organisers chose not to distribute the video clip to the 1500 delegates after the conference in an effort to harmonise things. Driscoll responds by saying:
“The leaders of the event are good guys whom I still consider friends, and I’ve never met Bill Hybels so I won’t speak about him personally.”
It seems as if Driscoll is maturing against the attacks he faces from critics as in the past, he would have lashed out. So why has the blogging world gone crazy about this story? Well there are a number of strange things happening here all rolled up into one. I’ll try to unpack this for you.
Go to the YouTube video and check out the comments from people viewing the video. Here Driscoll gets attacked by non-Christians for being a “dangerous” and “destructive” religious freak using the imagery of war to rally the troops. Some also have an issue that the video was shot at a military cemetery and that Driscoll has dishonoured the fallen by pushing his religious agenda.
Then the Christians also get fired up against the content of the video message. To summarise in three words, it’s, “men, mission, message,” in regards to church planting.
Men
Driscoll firmly believes in the male headship of the Church. He doesn’t hate women, nor is he chauvinistic in his biblical world view. His own Church has many women in leadership roles. It’s simply in the overall leadership of the Church does he push the male eldership role. I personally agree with this model for Church governing. As you can imagine, many don’t. Therefore he cops a lot of crap on this one.
Mission
Driscoll preaches the missional Church. In a nutshell, it’s about every Church member incarnating into culture to present the Gospel in a way relevant to that culture. Here’s where the conservatives freak out cause many Mars Hill Church bible studies occur in bars and tattoo shops in Seattle where Driscoll’s Church is based. The video uses a lot of “in your face” tones and is uncomfortable to watch for those in the “seeker sensitive” movement.
Message
Driscoll has many enemies in this area. One of my favourite lines from him is, “we put the ‘fun’ back into fundamentalism.” Driscoll’s theology is fundamental in nature - take the male eldership for example. It’s in this area that he cops criticism from all the liberals cause he contends for Biblical truth. His catch cry is “Reaching Out Without Selling Out”
So now you can begin to understand the reasons behind Driscoll’s rise in the world of Technorati searches. Everyone is writing about him - whether they like him or hate him. Fundamentalists hate him for his take on culture and mission. Liberals hate him for his take on theology. The secular world hates him cause his Church is gaining momentum and he continues to push boundaries for the Kingdom. In fact, Mars Hill Church after existing for 10 years is now ranked 16th in the top 20 Churches in the US.
What’s my lay opinion about all this?
If I can indulge, I fully agree with Driscoll’s take on Church. This video was about Church planting and I agree with the three basic principles he talks about. Male eldership is biblical and I support Driscoll’s view on this topic. This flies in the face of modern Christianity - as shown by Hybels comments.
It seems that political correctness is crippling the Church these days. I am not against females in leadership roles. I love to learn and be guided by females - we have a bunch at my church which I look up to tremendously. But the ultimate earthly authority goes to the male cause that’s the way God intended it to be. If you have an issue with that, bring it up with God cause He said it to be so. Not Driscoll, not me.
Instead of ruling over females, God’s men are urged to take their positions seriously and will be held accountable for their leadership and attitudes. A man in leadership should be humble for the task at hand instead of having a big head. This is the exact reason why Driscoll’s Acts 29 Network assesses potential Church planters and looks for qualities needed for a successful Church plant.
As the video shows in it’s imagery, too many Church plants end in death - hence the graves. Paul urged Timothy to fight the “good war” against the enemies of Christ - hence the military cemetery. And yet it’s the location and the style of the video which has caused as much of an uproar as the content.
Driscoll, you have my vote. You must be doing something right to have all the spectrum’s of criticism against you. It will be interesting to see how this whole thing pans out.
mark driscoll, bill hybels, driscoll, hybels, driscoll video, youtube, emergent, fundamentalist, missional, emerging church

